"as if someone had a fur glove and was caressing us all over and over except it was warm and alive" She used to describe JC's voice like this. It was supposed to be sexy then too but mostly it just struck me as gross. I was never so grateful as when she seemingly forgot this analogy and let it go. It's a damn shame that she's remembered it.
I can understand finding the fur glove potentially arousing, since it ties into sensation play. Especially if it was something like rabbit fur.
However, um... describing someone's VOICE like that is really, really weird and downright disturbing. I don't want someone's voice to be a part of foreplay unless it involves whispering huskily in my ear or moaning softly. I definitely don't want it to be doing things voices are physically incapable of doing, such as being tangible and caressing me.
no subject
She used to describe JC's voice like this. It was supposed to be sexy then too but mostly it just struck me as gross. I was never so grateful as when she seemingly forgot this analogy and let it go. It's a damn shame that she's remembered it.
I can understand finding the fur glove potentially arousing, since it ties into sensation play. Especially if it was something like rabbit fur.
However, um... describing someone's VOICE like that is really, really weird and downright disturbing. I don't want someone's voice to be a part of foreplay unless it involves whispering huskily in my ear or moaning softly. I definitely don't want it to be doing things voices are physically incapable of doing, such as being tangible and caressing me.
LKH, why do you fail so hard at sexy analogies?