Richard asks if JC wants to protect the entire USA from the Vampire Council, and JC says yes. <----- Protect it, rule it with an iron fist, is there really any difference? (Possibly not to a man who was born in the middle ages and raised by the nobility, actually. I'm not saying that all of the nobility was like that... but not all of them were nice guys, either.)
Jean-Claude with all his fancy fetish yummy clothes, standing there nude and covered in more body fluids than a CSI episode. <--- This sentence confuses me and makes my head hurt. Also, if by 'fancy fetish gear' you mean 'tacky as hell fetish gear' then I am one step closer to decoding the meaning behind this inscrutable transmission.
"but we'd already chased out three of them, plus the remnant of the Darkness." No. No you did not.
Listen, the other thing is both more accurate and truthful, however, it doesn't sound very badass does it to say that the Council members got bored and/or hungry and left to find their own eats, now does it? JC, who is aware of this, puts a more Anita-positive spin on things.
"we make love, not war?" and he nods.
for whatever reason, this line reminds me of Cartman from South Park's deep, irrational loathing for hippies. Perhaps it's simply because I would love to hear his thoughts on this battle plan?
Richard says JC is "talking about setting up a Council here in America with you as the head" and JC nods.
Three hilarious points.
1 - In Burnt Offerings, the Council accuses JC of this. He denies it by saying that he is too young, too weak, and too cowardly. It seems that they know him better than Anita thought that they did. 2 - I LOVE the way that JC frames this as "I'm just doing this to help EVERYONE! Because I CARE! Now, where'd I put my crown? What? This old thing? I've had it for centuries. I definitely didn't commission anyone to make it for me last month." Ahhhhh, JC, if only you'd found your way into a better series. 3 - JC's argument about the abridgement of autonomy to 'save everyone' and that he's doing evil for good purposes actually bears a rough resemblance to similar speeches that were made in real life. Richard and Anita, although not there for the speeches, should be at least semi-cognoscente of this. They aren't, of course. So, of course, they TRUST JC and throw themselves headlong into this stupid plan rather than even considering other options, including Bibi's idea. The road to hell really IS paved with good intentions... and I bet JC knows that for a fact.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2013-04-18 06:50 am (UTC)Jean-Claude with all his fancy fetish yummy clothes, standing there nude and covered in more body fluids than a CSI episode. <--- This sentence confuses me and makes my head hurt. Also, if by 'fancy fetish gear' you mean 'tacky as hell fetish gear' then I am one step closer to decoding the meaning behind this inscrutable transmission.
"but we'd already chased out three of them, plus the remnant of the Darkness." No. No you did not.
Listen, the other thing is both more accurate and truthful, however, it doesn't sound very badass does it to say that the Council members got bored and/or hungry and left to find their own eats, now does it? JC, who is aware of this, puts a more Anita-positive spin on things.
"we make love, not war?" and he nods.
for whatever reason, this line reminds me of Cartman from South Park's deep, irrational loathing for hippies. Perhaps it's simply because I would love to hear his thoughts on this battle plan?
Richard says JC is "talking about setting up a Council here in America with you as the head" and JC nods.
Three hilarious points.
1 - In Burnt Offerings, the Council accuses JC of this. He denies it by saying that he is too young, too weak, and too cowardly. It seems that they know him better than Anita thought that they did.
2 - I LOVE the way that JC frames this as "I'm just doing this to help EVERYONE! Because I CARE! Now, where'd I put my crown? What? This old thing? I've had it for centuries. I definitely didn't commission anyone to make it for me last month." Ahhhhh, JC, if only you'd found your way into a better series.
3 - JC's argument about the abridgement of autonomy to 'save everyone' and that he's doing evil for good purposes actually bears a rough resemblance to similar speeches that were made in real life. Richard and Anita, although not there for the speeches, should be at least semi-cognoscente of this. They aren't, of course. So, of course, they TRUST JC and throw themselves headlong into this stupid plan rather than even considering other options, including Bibi's idea. The road to hell really IS paved with good intentions... and I bet JC knows that for a fact.