HIT LIST MORAL/LEGAL FAILS OF ANITA
Nov. 11th, 2013 02:03 pm- I'm going to take a short break befire I start sporking Kiss the Dead in order to get the next installment of my fanfic "Sue vs Sue" up because I've been neglecting it.
- Danse Macabre is currently being sporked at Ramblings of a Creative Double Dipper, and she put her finger on something I have been trying to for awhile regarding the nonsense about how Richard is homophobic cuz he doesn't want to have sex with guys. Now, the obvious fact of that being completely absurd is self-evident, as is the fact that Anita probably just thinks this because *she* wants him to bone her other boyfriends for her benefit, but there was always something more nasty still about it that I could never quite articulate, and she put it perfectly:
"Stating that not desiring something is indicative of -ist-ish behavior on your part is a manipulative tactic... It's not that Richard is a homophobe. It's that Richard isn't giving Anita what she wants "
I know this probably was obvious to all of you, but I hadn't quite realized it yet. The manipulation aspect of it, I mean. Probably because Anita usually comes off as too dumb and ignorant of how people work to be properly manipulative most of the time. CW also points out something very notable about this particuliar instance of "homophobia" from Richard: "You know, it seemed that Richard's disgust with the whole JC/Auggie/Anita thing centered on the issue of consent. Anita and Jean Claude Raped Augistine and all of his people. Richard did not say "How could you let that disgusting homosexual pair of monsters fuck each other on top of you" or anything like that. His issue was that Jean Claude and Anita collectively rolled another person and then screwed him and every person tied to him while he was in a state of dubious consent."
This is part of what wigs me out about this series. You'd think that if LKH (not Anita, but LKH) really wanted to paint Richard as homophobic, she'd have had him object specifically to JC boning Auggie because their both men, instead of accusing JC and Anita of raping Augustine like he did. Likewise, many of Anita's rape victims *act* like rape victims afterwards, such as London hiding from her and crying in the bathroom. You'd think that if LKH really didn't think this was rape, she wouldn't write people having these kinds of reactions to it. There are about another dozen or so examples of this sort of thing I could name, but what it comes down to is that while it usually seems unintentional how awful Anita and what she does is, sometimes it seems like LKH is actually deliberately making her do these terrible things with knowledge of how terrible they are and how it's hurting the other characters...yet still also thinking that it's sexy or brave or that Anita should be praised and seen as a hero for it. And frankly, that scares me WAY more than if she just plain didn't seem to realize what she was writing like it usually seems.
Anyway, here's the moral and/or legal failures of our heroine in Hit List. Feel free to add any I missed!
( HIT LIST MORAL/LEGAL FAILS OF ANITA )
- Danse Macabre is currently being sporked at Ramblings of a Creative Double Dipper, and she put her finger on something I have been trying to for awhile regarding the nonsense about how Richard is homophobic cuz he doesn't want to have sex with guys. Now, the obvious fact of that being completely absurd is self-evident, as is the fact that Anita probably just thinks this because *she* wants him to bone her other boyfriends for her benefit, but there was always something more nasty still about it that I could never quite articulate, and she put it perfectly:
"Stating that not desiring something is indicative of -ist-ish behavior on your part is a manipulative tactic... It's not that Richard is a homophobe. It's that Richard isn't giving Anita what she wants "
I know this probably was obvious to all of you, but I hadn't quite realized it yet. The manipulation aspect of it, I mean. Probably because Anita usually comes off as too dumb and ignorant of how people work to be properly manipulative most of the time. CW also points out something very notable about this particuliar instance of "homophobia" from Richard: "You know, it seemed that Richard's disgust with the whole JC/Auggie/Anita thing centered on the issue of consent. Anita and Jean Claude Raped Augistine and all of his people. Richard did not say "How could you let that disgusting homosexual pair of monsters fuck each other on top of you" or anything like that. His issue was that Jean Claude and Anita collectively rolled another person and then screwed him and every person tied to him while he was in a state of dubious consent."
This is part of what wigs me out about this series. You'd think that if LKH (not Anita, but LKH) really wanted to paint Richard as homophobic, she'd have had him object specifically to JC boning Auggie because their both men, instead of accusing JC and Anita of raping Augustine like he did. Likewise, many of Anita's rape victims *act* like rape victims afterwards, such as London hiding from her and crying in the bathroom. You'd think that if LKH really didn't think this was rape, she wouldn't write people having these kinds of reactions to it. There are about another dozen or so examples of this sort of thing I could name, but what it comes down to is that while it usually seems unintentional how awful Anita and what she does is, sometimes it seems like LKH is actually deliberately making her do these terrible things with knowledge of how terrible they are and how it's hurting the other characters...yet still also thinking that it's sexy or brave or that Anita should be praised and seen as a hero for it. And frankly, that scares me WAY more than if she just plain didn't seem to realize what she was writing like it usually seems.
Anyway, here's the moral and/or legal failures of our heroine in Hit List. Feel free to add any I missed!
( HIT LIST MORAL/LEGAL FAILS OF ANITA )